|
| |
THE VENDOR'S VOICE
WINTER, 2006
PROUDLY SERVING RANDOLPH-SHEPPARD MANAGERS AND THEIR FAMILIES"
RSVAI
53 WEST JACKSON, SUITE 522
CHICAGO, IL 60604
PH.: (312) 663-0288
FAX: (312) 663-0289
e-MAIL: rsvai@sbcglobal.net
THE VENDOR'S VOICE
provides a forum for issues of interest concerning the Business Enterprise
Program for the Blind and the Randolph-Sheppard Act. Editorials, columns and
articles appearing in this publication are the opinions of the author and do not
necessarily reflect the positions of RSVAI's board of directors.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Chairperson
Janet Wetmore
847-456-4193 cell
janschuler@sbcglobal.net
Vice Chairperson
John Gordon
312-491-0752
blindvendor@aol.com
Secretary/Treasurer
Gloria Gillick
312-520-0745
glogillick@aol.com
TABLE OF CONTENTS (TOC)
**1 FROM THE PRESIDENT'S
DESK
**2 RSVAI CHRISTMAS IN CHICAGO
**3 RSVAI CHRISTMAS PARTY
**4 THE 4TH ANNUAL FUND RAISER IS COMING AND WE NEED YOUR HELP
**5 DON'T GIVE TIL IT
HURTS, GIVE TIL IT FEELS GOOD
**6 2006 NTCBV AND NTCBV REGISTRATION FORM
**7 FALL CONVENTION 2005
**8 SENATOR JACOBS HAS SPOKEN! LET'S SEE WHO WAS LISTENING?
**9 MY WAY OR HIS WAY
**10 A SYNOPSIS OF THE NEGOTIATIONS BETWEEN THE ILLINOIS COMMITTEEOF BLIND
VENDORS AND THE BLAGOJEVICH ADMINISTRATION00
**11 LETTER TO SETH WEBB
**12 RESOLUTION 2005-02 WAS PASSED AT THE STATE CONVENTION IN NOVEMBER 2005
**13 QUICK NOTE FROM THE BEPB TRAINING DEPARTMENT
**14 WHAT GOOD PUBLIC RELATIONS CAN DO!
**15 MY LIFE AS A CERTIFIED VENDOR
**16 LARRY HUTSON--RENAISSANCE MAN
**17 JOE VENDOR
**18 HAIL TO THE CHAMPIONS!
**19 PROGRAMS FOR DISABLED AND BLIND FACING INCREASED SCRUTINY
**20 LETTER TO THE EDITOR OF USA TODAY
**21 LETTER TO THE UNITED STATES' SENATE
**22 LETTER TO SENATOR MIKE ENZI
**23 RECORDS OF RETENTION SCHEDULE
1 FROM THE PRESIDENT'S
DESK
By: Janet Wetmore
The year 2005 is quickly coming to an end which means a flurry of holiday
parties, shopping and of course to put us all in the mood--snow. By the time you
receive this edition, the New Year will be upon us. With the football season
almost over and spring training right around the corner, hope blooms anew for
baseball fans who were not lucky enough to see their respective teams rewarded
with a World Series victory. The only way to survive a Chicago winter for me is
to dream about the Cardinal game I was able to go to back in July at Busch
Stadium when temperatures topped 100 degrees. I must congratulate the Chicago
White Sox for winning the World Series. What a terrific event that was for the
City of Chicago as well as Major League Baseball in general.
As each year comes
to an end, it is a good time to take stock of accomplishments and to prepare
ourselves for the challenges ahead. Every blind vendor in Illinois who attended
the Fall Conference, called the ICBV information line, read the quarterly issues
of the Vendor's Voice or has spoken to their colleagues knows that challenging
times are still ahead. At the national level, blind vendors and the
Randolph-Sheppard Act continue to be attacked. At the ICBV and BEPB Fall
Convention, Ms. Krista Merritt, Policy Analyst for ACB and RSVA presented
information concerning the oversight hearing being held on October 20, 2005.
This hearing was conducted to gather information about two federal programs
namely the Randolph-Sheppard Program and the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Program. The
blind vendors voted unanimously to send Allen Sugar and Ron Eshoo to Washington
D.C. to testify at the hearing. Unfortunately, there was no guarantee that there
would be enough space available to even be in the hearing much less to testify.
Printed in this
issue are 3 letters that Kevin Dwyer has written and sent concerning this
subject. Hopefully, these will serve as an example of what we as individual
vendors can do to help the Randolph-Sheppard Act survive these attacks.
The issues
concerning the Governor and the State here in Illinois are more familiar to us;
however not any less threatening. The corporate sponsorship initiative is still
looming over our heads even though resolutions have been passed for our benefit.
Negotiations continue despite the incorrect Administrative Order being signed by
the Governor. The one shining ray of hope across the state is Senator Mike
Jacobs with legislation in hand. As a result of vendors who have participated in
gathering support from their own legislators, Senator Jacobs will have the
support we need to get the legislation passed. Once and for all, trained blind
men and women in Illinois will have self employment opportunities available to
them as the Randolph-Sheppard Act intended.
Also, please be
sure to read articles submitted by Dan and Kevin Dwyer regarding information
about the Rock Your Heart Valentine's fund raiser. Be sure to make your
reservations early at the Wyndham Hotel O'Hare so you don't have to travel home
that evening. Reservations are only $79 single or double occupancy. No one wants
to miss this event. Unfortunately, last year I was unable to attend due to
commitments at the annual Sagebrush Convention out west; however, this year I am
looking forward to attending and having a fabulous time. The information
regarding the 2006 NTCBV is included in this issue. If you wish to attend or
have any questions regarding the Sagebrush Conference, please call the RSVAI
office.
Along with other means, it is important for this newsletter to
keep Randolph-Sheppard Vendors informed about the threats and challenges that
face us; however, it is also important to convey to our readers about certain
success stories. If you or somebody you know has a certain success story, please
do not hesitate to pass it along for us to include in our newsletter. It is our
hope to make this section a permanent addition to the Vendor's Voice. Without
success stories, the battles that we face will feel futile. Thanks again to
everyone who has submitted articles. We here at RSVAI would like to take this
opportunity to wish all of you and your families a very healthy and prosperous
New Year. Return to TOC
2 RSVAI CHRISTMAS IN
CHICAGO
By Janet Wetmore
If you missed the Christmas Party in Chicago you missed a great time. The
Marquette Inn Restaurant was decked out in holiday decor as music played in the
background to put us in the holiday spirit. The food was hot and tasty and the
desserts were superb. The evening highlight was the door prizes that were given
to the lucky winners. Everything from atomic clocks to holiday spirits were
passed out after dinner.
The best part of the evening was visiting with
everyone. It's times like these that I remember why we work so hard for our
cause and that is to have the opportunity to be the best we all can be. A
special thanks to Mercedes Acosta Collins for making sure the evening was as
perfect as possible. I know everyone that attended appreciated her efforts.
Thanks Mercedes, we love you. Return to TOC
3
RSVAI CHRISTMAS PARTY SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS
By: Gloria J. Gillick
Our annual Christmas party was held on December 7, 2005 at Shakey's Pizza
with approximately 59 people in attendance. The room glowed of Christmas spirit.
It had center pieces on the tables, Santa and his helpers greeting the guests,
Kim Christ singing live holiday songs, and presents for everyone.
It was a
festive time and a nice feeling to see so many people come together to visit,
reminisce and just be sociable without weighing in on work or related issues.
Some special
guests in attendance were Deborah Ringer and personnel from KEB, Karen Ketcia
from CSI, Leroy Caudle and all the folks from Leroy's Vending, Bettye Odem-Davis
along with several BEPB staff, Mr. Bill Byers and of course all of the vendors
along with their families and employees. It was a great time for Mike and I &
our hope is that everyone enjoyed the experience as much as us.
RSVAI officers and
members wish all of you a happy holiday and very prosperous new year.
Return to TOC
4 THE 4TH ANNUAL FUND
RAISER IS COMING AND WE NEED YOUR HELP
By: Kevin Dwyer
Have you heard? The ICBV fund raiser is fast approaching. The fund raiser is
scheduled for Friday February 17, 2006 at the Wyndham Hotel 6810 N Mannheim Rd.
in Rosemont.
Last year my brother Dan & I had six weeks to plan the fund raiser,
and we were able to raise over $12,000 for the ICBV. Now I don't want it to
sound like we were the only two who were involved, we definitely weren't. There
are too many people to thank, but you know who you are.
Like last years
fund raiser, this year we will be entertained by several of Chicago's hottest
bands. There will also be a cash bar, raffles and door prizes.
Planning
for this year's event began the day after last year's. We anticipate that the
extra time planning will result in a bigger success this year. Another way we
hope to guarantee a successful event is to get help from people like you.
Help sell tickets, help stuff envelopes or help the night of the fund raiser.
Perhaps you could donate a raffle prize or maybe you have a friend or family
member who would like to buy an ad in our ad book. No contribution is too small.
In fact, why don't you purchase an ad in our book promoting your business, keep
in mind it is an allowable business expense.
There are so many details that
need to be taken care of, that there can never be enough helping hands. Call
either Dan Dwyer (312) 656-3253 or myself (217) 493-7869 to volunteer or to
donate. Return to TOC
5 DON'T GIVE TIL IT
HURTS, GIVE TIL IT FEELS GOOD
By: Dan Dwyer
With the 4th annual ICBV fund raiser fast approaching, and with the
difficult task of selling tickets and ads having begun, I thought this would be
a good time to share with my fellow vendors what YOUR elected committee does for
you.
1. Advocates
politically for blind vendors.
2. Advocates for individual managers when they need it.
3. Continuously seeks out new employment opportunities for blind vendors.
4. Drafts new legislation to protect and enhance the livelihood of blind
vendors.
5. Generates money through volume buying programs.
6. Sponsors our annual training conference.
7. Procures benefits for blind vendors (i.e. retirement & disability)
8. Represents Illinois' blind vendors on national issues.
9. Works with the SLA to develop policies and procedures.
10. Countless actions on behalf of blind vendors.
Contributing to
the committee is money well spent on your behalf. For those vendors who don't
realize it the committee is continuously advocating and working to enhance and
preserve each blind vendor's livelihood. The fund raiser is not only intended to
be a social gathering and celebration of our unity, but it is also a vehicle to
raise much needed money. This money allows the committee to continue to work for
you. This money covers the day to day operations of the committee, secretarial
costs, phone, rent and other costs associated with working for you.
For those of
you who have given generously you are helping yourself and our program. For
those of who do not contribute take a hard look at yourself and ask yourself how
important your job, the elected committee and the program are. I'm sure you can
skip a trip to McDonald's this week and buy at least one ticket.
Isn't buying
a few raffle tickets worth what the ICBV does for you?
And please remember
don't give til it hurts give til it feels good. Return to TOC
6 2006 NTCBV THE
ANNUAL NATIONAL TRAINING CONFERENCE FOR BLIND VENDORS THE SAGEBRUSH CONFERENCE
SPONSORED BY RANDOLPH-SHEPPARD VENDORS OF AMERICA
BUILDING
OUR FUTURE FROM ADVERSITY
THE RANDOLPH-SHEPPARD IN
THE FUTURE
NTCBV Chair: Richard Bird
(OH)
Program Chair: Ralph
Sanders (NV)
DATE: Tuesday, February
7th --Saturday, February 12th
PLACE: Stardust Resort &
Casino
3000 Las Vegas Boulevard,
Las Vegas, NV 89109
ROOM RATES: West Tower,
$85.00 (plus tax)
Spa Suite, $115.00 (plus
tax)
NOTE: HOTEL RESERVATIONS
DEADLINE IS JANUARY 7, 2006. Please check the Hotel's room reservations policy.
Room reservations MUST be made directly with the Hotel.
PHONE: (866) 281-1034
"Meeting Group Code NTCBV06"
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 7TH
10:00 am-2:00 pm
NTCBV Board Lunch Meeting
3:00 pm-6:00 pm
Conference Registration
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 8TH
8:00 am-4:00 pm
Conference Registration
9:00 am-1:00 pm
RSVA Board Lunch Meeting
2:00 pm-5:00 pm
Conference Programming
7:00 pm-9:00 pm
Welcome to Nevada
Reception "Refreshments"
THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 9TH
8:00 am-4:00 pm
Conference Registration
8:00 am-9:00 am
Conference Breakfast
9:00 am-12:00 pm
Welcome, Introductions
and Conference Programming
2:00 pm-4:00 pm
Administrators Workshop
2:00 pm-4:00 pm
Elected Committees
Workshop
6:00 pm-8:00 pm
Mardi Gras Reception
"Refreshments"
FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 10TH
8:00 am-4:00 pm
Conference Registration
8:00 am-12:00 pm
Exhibitor Booth Set-Up
8:00 am-9:00 am
Conference Breakfast
9:00 am-12:00 pm
Conference Programming
12:00 pm-5:00 pm
NTCBV EXHIBIT EXPO
2006--OPEN EXHIBIT HALL--CASH & PRIZE DRAWINGS
5:00 pm-7:00 pm
Valentine Reception
"Refreshments"
SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 11TH
8:00 am-9:00 am
Conference Breakfast
9:00 am-12:00 pm
Conference Programming
12:00 pm-2:00 pm
Conference Luncheon
2:00 pm-3:00 pm
NTCBV Wrap Up
GET CONFERENCE UPDATES AT
www.ntcbv-sagebrush.com
NATIONAL TRAINING
CONFERENCE for BLIND VENDORS
NTCBV REGISTRATION FORM
NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS:
CITY:
STATE:
ZIP:
PHONE:
FAX:
E-MAIL:
VENDOR BEP ADMINISTRATOR EXHIBITOR SPEAKER OTHER
MEDIA FORMAT LARGE PRINT TAPE BRAILLE
REGISTRATION FEE BY
DECEMBER 31ST: $100.00
AFTER DECEMBER 31ST & AT
THE CONFERENCE: $150.00
MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO:
NTCBV
RETURN CHECK & FORM TO:
Kim Venable, Treasurer
1808 Faith Place Ste. B
Terrytown,
LA 70056-4104
CRITICAL NOTICE FOR ALL
PARTICIPANTS INCLUDING OFFICERS, GUESTS AND OTHERS:
Absolutely no one without
a valid registration badge will be permitted to enter any function. Attempting
to attend without your badge will result in your removal from the function. No
refunds after 12-31-05. Return to TOC
7 FALL CONVENTION
2005
By: John Gordon
So far I have
heard from many of you who paid compliments to the experience at this year's
fall convention. We had a full training agenda with a lot of discussion
surrounding new legislation, retirement and national issues of interest. Most of
us felt empowered by the speech delivered by Senator Michael Jacobs. I hope all
of us walked away with an understanding that our single voice does indeed make a
difference.
On Friday evening we had great attendance and participation at our
food show. Managers, their families, employees and staff who attended got a
glimpse of many new products offered in our industry. Everyone seemed to have a
great time as demonstrated on our ICBV web site. If you gained some extra pounds
it would be understandable, for the Wyndham Hotel surely offered great food and
no one appeared to go hungry.
On Saturday afternoon RSVAI sponsored a
beautiful luncheon complete with awards and entertainment and Saturday evening
we had our annual awards banquet with 238 people in attendance.
I am still
scratching my head wondering whether our comedian was at our luncheon that day
or if there was a guest appearance as the master of ceremonies at the evening
banquet. Ed Birmingham added a great mix of insults, mispronunciation of names
and a few pinches here and there to keep the mood light.
Our prestigious
manager of the year award went to none other than Betty Wilkerson from
Springfield, Illinois.
Managers, staff and even some training managers
from the current class participated in many different functions at the
conference. They diligently worked on room set ups, registration tables, awards
and many other items. Some were small and some were large but all were needed
for a successful conference.
Two very obvious people who were not in
attendance this year were the ICBV liaison Ms. Pat Trueblood and ICBV Vice
President Mr. Donald Anderson. Unfortunately Ms. Trueblood could not attend due
to some health issues but she was surely missed. Mr. Anderson whose wife
delivered a baby girl just a few days prior to the convention was at home making
sure his new family was settling in. Return to TOC
8 SENATOR JACOBS HAS
SPOKEN! LET'S SEE WHO WAS
LISTENING?
By: Ed Birmingham
I would like to
start out by thanking Senator Michael Jacobs for taking time out to address all
of us at our Fall Training Weekend. More importantly, I would like to thank him
for sponsoring our proposed legislation. When this legislation is finally
passed, it will create a tremendous opportunity for Blind Vendors in Illinois.
Let me take you back to that Saturday afternoon in October. It was right
after Brian Hebeler presented Senator Jacobs with his plaque commemorating our
appreciation for his unwavering support for Illinois Blind Vendors. John Gordon
asked Senator Jacobs to speak to the blind vendors about the importance of
getting support for future legislation. Senator Jacobs explained how important
it is to use our connections to generate support for our side. He informed us on
what a super lobbyist Tom Cullen is. Jacobs also stated that whatever we were
paying Mr. Cullen, it wasn't enough, because he is very good at what he does.
Senator Jacobs went on to say that Mr. Cullen will protect us and make sure that
all legislators in the Capital are aware of the issues that are important to the
blind vendors.
Senator Jacobs reminded us that we all have a responsibility
to vote, be organized and to support our organizations. And if you don't, then
shame on you! At this time, I would like to address the responsibility of the
vendors in contributing to the lobbyist fund.
The Illinois Committee of
Blind Vendors is our version of a union. The Committee advocates for vendors and
makes sure that they are treated fairly under our rules and regulations. Unlike
a regular labor union, we do not deduct money from your paycheck for these
services. Instead, we ask for voluntary contributions so that we can contract
out the services that will benefit all of us, such as a lobbyist. If you were
listening closely to Senator Jacobs, he clearly stated that our lobbyist Mr. Tom
Cullen was one of the best. I realize that most of you may have no idea what Mr.
Cullen does for us. Quite simply, he is our eyes, ears, and mouth down in the
State Capital. Also, as Senator Jacobs stated, Mr. Cullen will protect us and
make sure that legislators in Springfield are aware of issues that are important
to us.
Mr. Gordon recently stated on the information line that only 25 percent
of our vendors contribute to the lobbyist fund. Shame on the 75 percent of you
who choose not to participate, but nevertheless benefit from all of the efforts
of our lobbyist!
Let me try to help all of you non-contributors. It has
been said many times it doesn't matter how little or how much you contribute,
something is better than nothing. All you have to do is determine an amount that
you would like to contribute, and then decide what would be the best payment
plan for you. You can send in a check once a year, twice a year, every month or
every quarter, whatever works out the best for you is o.k. with us. So there is
no excuse for not contributing! The one reality of being a politically proactive
group is that it takes voluntary contributions in order to get our message heard
to the right people and in the right places. Do your fellow vendors a favor and
dust the cobwebs off those wallets and purses and please join the other 25
percent who regularly contribute to the lobbyist fund. Together we can make a
difference in protecting all of our livelihoods. Thank you for your continued
support. Return to TOC
9 MY WAY OR HIS WAY
By: John Gordon
The Governor is
working diligently through his own corporate sponsorship initiative to force
feed you a bunch of junk; you want to spit up. Committee members and I have told
many of you time and time again the advantages of collective buying.
At
various times I have brought to you the advantages of having one bottler serve
all of our managers for obvious financial advantages. Over the years I have also
brought to you similar proposals ranging from coffee to snack items. The major
difference is, if our managers worked collectively together and supported
product lines, which in turn financially support us, things would be much
different.
Because we could not agree and work together, the Governor's office
is attempting to do this for us. Hopefully we learn by this and remember that in
the future, if we do not choose to take control, someone will take it for us. Return to TOC
10 A SYNOPSIS OF THE
NEGOTIATIONS BETWEEN THE ILLINOIS COMMITTEE OF BLIND VENDORS AND THE BLAGOJEVICH
ADMINISTRATION
By: Donnie Anderson
November 11, 2005
As a matter of
fact, the current negotiations that are taking place between the Illinois
Committee of Blind Vendors (ICBV) and the Governor's Chief of Staff, Louanner
Peters were entered into by the Governor's Office only as a means to stop a
planned, permitted protest at the James R. Thompson Center. The protest is one
in a series of measures enacted and planned that are designed to affect
adherence to the spirit and letter of state law 2420. Demands have been made by
members of the Governor's staff that tie support for blind managers to the blind
manager's acceptance of the Governor's corporate sponsorship and naming rights
agenda. Negative reactions to the Governor's plans have been expressed by the
Illinois Legislature, local and national press and the public. Restrictions have
successfully been placed on the Governor's authority regarding corporate
sponsorship and state branding rights. Therefore, the piggy backing of corporate
sponsorship to our advancement is a regrettable fact. In spite of this, the ICBV
has entered in good faith negotiations with the governor's office in an effort
to promote the rights and opportunities of blind managers and avoid the need for
any more embarrassment to Governor Blagojevich or his staff.
It is and always
has been our position that the governor's responsibility was to direct his
amenities to adhere to the spirit and letter of state law 2420. The time for
excuses has passed. It is unacceptable to us that you use as a negotiating
point, as has been said many times by the governor's staff, that past
administrations have not helped us and that this administration hasn't helped
but that it also hasn't harmed the blind vendors either. This inference that we
should be grateful for the governor's benevolence reflects an attitude that we
find distasteful. Furthermore, the recent administrative order is evidence to
the contrary as it greatly harms and restricts the opportunities of the blind
managers and is therefore completely unacceptable to us. It must be rescinded
and replaced with our negotiated administrative order. It was an abruptly issued
stunt to provide the administration political cover and fell completely out of
line with the stated and agreed upon points of our past good faith negotiations.
It has set us back and has prompted this statement of fact from us. The blind
managers and the ICBV have made it clear to the public and the state
legislature, both politically and through direct civil action, that the blind
vendors in this state will no longer permit the Governor's lack of enforcement
of the spirit and letter of state law 2420.
Through taking the high road and
adopting a vision for the future that strongly supports blind vendors, Governor
Blagojevich could accept an opportunity to become the hero and expand the
opportunities for current and future blind managers. He will in turn get our
full support for a jointly negotiated naming rights proposal that he needs in
order to move his agenda forward. At this difficult time, ongoing headlines and
investigations question the nature of the current and past administration's
contract awards and appointments. They cast doubt on this administration's
ability to, as Governor Blagojevich has promised, change the way business is
done in Springfield. It would seem to be highly desirable from a PR standpoint
alone for the governor to embrace the hand of a blind business owner and their
family while they take over an opportunity not previously afforded to them? This
and other scenarios could be repeated many times over in front of large
audiences of blind vendors, advocates, their families and the media. The
Illinois Committee of Blind Vendors strongly desires to become that type of
partner and a proud supporter of Governor Blagojevich. We further commit that if
a high road partnership were undertaken, the ICBV will indeed sing its praises
such that it will be looked upon by other states as a model that demonstrates
the benefits to all governors, the blind vendors, the press and general public,
the virtues of holding true to the federal and state laws through the diligent
support that the Randolph-Sheppard program truly deserves.
Our only intention in
entering into these negotiations is to greatly advance the opportunities for
blind vendors and define our priority on state and federal property as the
United States Congress and the Illinois Legislature intended. A set of minimum
criteria has been provided to the Blagojevich Administration as a recap of our
negotiations to this point. This is our position on these matters.
Some of
these points we expect will find their way into an Administrative order, such as
our priority on state property. Other points will be acceptable in a memorandum
of understanding between the governor's office and the ICBV. All parties
will see that the ICBV is and will continue to be a partner with the governor's
office and looks for a win-win situation for everyone. Return to TOC
11 December 13, 2005
TO: Mr. Seth Webb
Director of Special
Projects
Office of the Governor
100 West Randolph
Floor 016, Suite 100
Chicago, IL 60601
FROM: Kim Christ
1712 Creekside Drive
Swansea, IL 62226
Mr. Webb,
I was informed of
the Governor's recent Executive Orders removing priority for Blind Vendors. I
must say that I was not surprised by such a power play. In fact, I expected
something of this nature. I have stood on the sidelines watching this issue
unfold. I have sat in meetings between representatives of the Governor's office
and the leadership of the Illinois Committee of Blind Vendors. What I saw was an
agenda; an agenda that was set forth, most probably by you. An agenda in which
the outcome was already predetermined, but you had a problem. The blind vendors
could actually think. They would not jump through your hoops. They asked
questions and got limited answers at best. They organized. They were going to
protest in Chicago (as they had in Springfield) against this issue, but
Hurricane Katrina came and the Governor's office used this issue to ask the
vendors for patience, to come back to the negotiating table and put patriotism
first. (I hate spin; specially using tragedy, so I found this abhorrent).
Nevertheless, the vendors did as the Governor's office requested, only to be
stabbed in the back.
I am a lifelong democrat; go ahead and check my voting
record. I have NEVER been embarrassed about my party affiliation; until now. The
democratic Governor of my state selling out to COCA COLA (big business); the
democratic Governor of my state taking away a right granted the blind by federal
law (the Randolph-Sheppard Act) and allowing other non-profit groups equal bid
access. Now a skin-head group or ultra right wing group that is non-profit can
bid against the visually impaired. Something is wrong with this picture; the
democratic Governor of my state fighting against those with disabilities instead
of fighting for them. When I cast my vote for the Governor, I did so thinking he
would epitomize the democratic principals. Free-enterprise separate from
government; respect for federally legislated laws and assisting those who in
many cases are on the outskirts for our society, those with disabilities.
Apparently I was wrong and now the visually impaired in my state suffer.
Someone recently asked me where the blind program went wrong. My answer was that
they underestimated their opponent. They placed too much trust in the Governor's
representatives; they believed they were negotiating in good faith.
Unfortunately they did not realize that politics and good faith rarely go
together. However, there is a silver lining; at least in my opinion. Each blind
vendor should go to their state representatives and their state senators and
demand an answer as to their position on the issues facing the blind vendors.
This would allow them to garner the information needed in order to campaign for;
or against these specific candidates, party affiliations would not be important
in this endeavor. They would then only support candidates that would support the
blind vendors and their issues. Then they should volunteer and campaign door to
door for the politicians in whom they are willing to put their trust.
My second
idea is not original, but it would be powerful. You see, one blind man walked
from Chicago to Springfield and it made quite an impact. How about 100 blind
persons walking from all areas of the state to get to Springfield; now that
would truly be newsworthy.
So Mr. Webb, I am hoping that influential persons in
the Governor's office will see what is occurring. I hope that they will see that
the actions taken against the blind vendors are in error and that they will
change the recent executive order and halt this corporate sponsorship
initiative. These actions are wrong for any administration, especially a
democratic administration. I have yet to find one person outside of the
Governor's office that feels that corporate sponsorship is a good idea. I have
asked fellow democrats and even republicans their opinion on corporate
sponsorship and have not found one person to support it.
I would appreciate
you taking these issues back to the Governor in order to facilitate co-operation
with the blind vendors in the state of Illinois. This would be a good first step
to begin to rebuild trust between your office and the blind vendors. As for me,
I am waiting and watching. I am not a blind vendor, I am an observer. I have no
say in this organization, but I will be watching what actions the Governor takes
on these issues. Elections are coming up. Political futures are up for grabs. My
vote will count.
Kim Christ
cc: Governor Blagojevich
cc: Sen. James Claybourne
cc: Rep. Thomas Holbrook
cc: Sen. Richard Durbin
cc: Sen. Barack Obama Return to TOC
12 RESOLUTION
2005-02 WAS PASSED AT THE STATE CONVENTION
IN NOVEMBER 2005
Sent to us by Bill Reif,
Board Member, National Federation of the Blind of Illinois
In support of
continued opportunities for blind vendors operating under the Randolph-Sheppard
Act WHEREAS: the Randolph-Sheppard Act, enacted in 1936, extends blind
persons the opportunity to achieve self-sufficiency and success by granting the
blind a preference in operating businesses that retail food and other items on
federal property; AND,
WHEREAS: the thousands of blind men and women who
have participated in this, the oldest job opportunity program for the blind,
have demonstrated that adequately trained and skilled blind people are quite
capable of managing successful businesses, often managing and supervising
several employees and tracking considerable inventories; AND,
WHEREAS: the
Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) recently
conducted a hearing at which testimony was presented regarding the success of
the Randolph-Sheppard program, as well as testimony regarding a parallel but
dissimilar program, established under the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (JWOD) that
offers the blind, and other persons regarded as being "severely disabled" what
is often subsistence-level employment in a setting which more generously rewards
those companies and persons that administer the program; AND,
WHEREAS:
the staff of the HELP Committee wrote a report that attacks the
Randolph-Sheppard Act and then recommends that the Randolph-Sheppard Act be
combined with JWOD, basing this recommendation on a characterization of blind
vendors and of the program that is scurrilous and inaccurate; AND,
WHEREAS:
in contrast to the success experienced and exhibited by blind vendors, most
disabled participants under the JWOD program continue to rely on government
assistance, having neither the opportunity to experience success nor the
opportunity to demonstrate, through their examples, that blind persons can
compete as business owners on terms of equality; AND,
WHEREAS: many blind
business owners, including those who operate vending facilities under the
Randolph-Sheppard Act, employ blind persons and persons with other disabilities
in percentages greater than those demonstrated by private industry generally;
AND,
WHEREAS: the inaccurate report compiled by the HELP Committee has
the potential to result in legislation that will dismantle this essential
opportunity for so many blind persons;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the
National Federation of the Blind of Illinois, in convention assembled this fifth
day of November, 2005 in the city of Rock Island, Illinois, that this
organization challenge the HELP Committee's distorted characterization of the
Randolph-Sheppard program;
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this organization
oppose any legislation that would eliminate this opportunity in exchange for the
limited opportunities available under JWOD Return to TOC
13 QUICK NOTE FROM
THE BEPB TRAINING DEPARTMENT
By: Terry-Ann Saurmann
For those of us in
the BEPB Training Department, the coming weeks are more than a celebration of
yet another holiday season, because we are nearing the conclusion of our second
training class of 2005, while gearing up to welcome a new class the week of
January 23, 2006. By the time you read this, four students will have completed
their Food Service On-The-Job-Training (OJT) assignments and will have taken the
Food Service final exam. One of them will have resumed a vending OJT assignment,
which was interrupted by illness earlier in training, while a fifth student will
have completed an extended Gift/Retail OJT assignment. At the same time, we will
have tested potentially as many as fifteen persons who are interested in
entering the next training class and will have conducted entrance interviews for
them at the ICRE-Wood training center on December 19 and 20.
All of us on
the BEPB Training staff congratulate those who are about to become BEPB Managers
and welcome the men and women who will be entering training in January. We wish
all of you a blessed and joyous holiday season and the best of everything in the
coming year
Matt Cunningham, Rick Jorgensen, John Reed, and Terry-Ann Saurmann
Return to TOC
14 WHAT GOOD PUBLIC
RELATIONS CAN DO!
By: Larry Jones
Well, my phone
rang one afternoon and it was Paul Drake. He had seen in the paper Dr. Richard
Snowden's name becoming Superintendent of the Illinois School for the Visually
Impaired. Included in Richard's resume was the fact that he had worked for the
Business Enterprise Program for the Blind (at that time known as Business
Opportunities for the Blind). Paul knew he had been around the program for a
long time, but he needed someone who had been around a longer time so he called
me. I told Paul that Richard was my first business counselor (supervisor at that
time). I immediately called at the school and we caught up on old times. Then we
looked to the future. We both agreed that a career day for the students would be
a way to have exposure to our program. Also we set up a luncheon meeting with
Richard, Paul, Pat, and I. The luncheon was to discuss the career day and the
possibilities of facility development in Jacksonville and the surrounding areas.
To bring everyone up to date:
1. A facility has been
opened in the school.
2. Ted Stice was awarded
the service agreement and has spent several dollars of his
personal money to help stimulate thisproject
3. Paul Liddle donated
his time and materials to build astage for the students.
4. The Illinois Committee
of Blind Vendors (this means all of the vendors) donated a Karaoke machine and a
commercial grade air hockey table that have both been a huge success.
In conclusion, the
last time I spoke with Richard he was very happy with the accomplishments to
date. He is a very dynamic person to work with. As a member of the public
relations committee I feel privileged to have renewed a friendship and have
hopes for the future for both the school and our program. Return to TOC
15 MY LIFE AS A
CERTIFIED VENDOR
By: Sonia Munoz
I think one the
most memorable days in my life, came when I first learned about the BEPB. While
riding a bus back home from Morton Community College in Cicero Illinois, a
passenger on that same bus must have noticed my cane and offered to assist me in
finding a seat. After we sat he discussed his girlfriend and her long standing
position as a manager with more than thirty years experience as a blind vendor.
After asking about my personal goals he suggested I do some more research on the
program. I immediately began to search for more details about this new
opportunity which eventually led me to a Department of Rehabilitation Services
counselor who set a tour date for me which provided an overview of some of the
facilities downtown and introduced me to some of our managers. Intrigued by this
opportunity I decided to enroll. Nine months later upon successful completion of
all modules I was certified as a program manager. I am now the proud inventoried
manager for the Recorder of Deeds Snack Shop in the County Building in Chicago.
With this opportunity I have discovered a sense of accomplishment and
self-worth. This position has allowed me to purchase a home. On September of
2004 I purchased a two bedroom condo in Burbank, Illinois a southwest suburb of
Chicago.
With Thanksgiving just a few weeks behind, I had the chance to
reflect on how thankful and lucky I have been to be a part of this program which
is near and dear to all of our hearts. Not only have I found a source of
fulfillment and independence. I have also met a lot of great friends; every one
of you who I have come in contact with, and some of you whom I have not, from
the training staff at ICRE, administrative staff, fellow managers, and new
trainees. I wish you all a merry Christmas and a very prosperous new year. Your
colleague - Sonia Munoz Return to TOC
16 LARRY HUTSON--RENAISSANCE MAN
By: Kathy Stepp
You're losing a seasoned
veteran. A loss to your program but an inspiration to anyone who has known him.
Larry is moving on to bigger and better things. He has always been active and
involved in the BEPB but feels now is the time to explore other options. Larry
says, "Don't put faith in any political administration; you have got to help
yourselves. Keep the pressure on; let them know we're here and that they can't
forget about us. You need to defend and protect yourselves; there is nothing
wrong with a blind person making good money, better than $45,000 a year. Don't
be complacent, there needs to be new leaderships, the same people can't be
around forever, step up."
Larry was born on August 4, 1941. He was born with
Glaucoma. He attended the Kentucky School for the blind. He received a Master's
Degree in Special Education: A Teaching Degree and went to the University of
Chicago on a full Scholarship, but tired of school, he did not finish, which he
regrets today and wishes he would have finished his schooling.
At the age of 20,
Larry lost all vision and remembers waking at his Aunt's house and knew it was
light out because he felt the sun. The last thing Larry recalls seeing was a red
plaid shirt that his gym teacher was wearing. When people ask Larry to describe
going blind he explains, "It's like sitting and watching the sun going down, do
you really know the exact moment of darkness?"
Larry worked in the Rehab field
for 12 years in the early 60's-early 70's. Larry had known about BEPB and
started training in early 1980. His first location was at Blue Electric in early
1981 in Blue Island. In 1982 he went to Markham Courthouse Cafe where he was
sure he knew everything about managing a Cafe. The cook made more money than he
did and he had "as much business running a cafeteria as stacking tee pees in a
square pile!"
Then Larry was off to Tinley Park Mental Health where he worked
with Ed Birmingham. In February of 1990 Larry went to manage the Prairie View
Rest Area where he will retire from. Larry has met a lot of people at his rest
area and has seen a lot of strange things happen. He met Paul Simon (the
Senator) while filling the pop machine, he asked a customer if they needed a
soda, the customer said yes and Larry said "I know who you are, I'd recognize
your voice anywhere" and they had a nice chat. Another time Larry had to refund
Governor Edgar for a bag of M&M's that didn't fall from the spiral, he was very
gracious and Larry was glad he was there to refund the Gov!
As everyone knows
all great men have great women that support them. Larry has Betty and they have
been married since May of 2001. Larry will retire soon and move to Florida for
the winter and will entertain Betty's granddaughter and spend the time with
friends and family.
Larry enjoys sports so much so that he built a concrete
barrier at his house to play basketball on and he put bells on the net to know
when he makes a basket. He played Beep Ball for several years and enjoys
baseball. Larry enjoys listening to music and has a CD Library of 1500 CD's.
Larry also is a Hamm Radio Operator.
Larry won't be idle in his retirement; he
hopes to write a book about his life and to market a game that he has been
thinking about for a couple of years.
It's been a pleasure knowing Larry has
always been there for the BEPB. We should all look at him as an example on how
to succeed in business and life. Return to TOC
17 JOE VENDOR
By: Gloria Gillick
Twas the night before
Christmas and all through the house, not a creature was stirring, not even a
mouse. Joe sat next to his Christmas tree, thinking about all of those vendors
in the world who couldn't see. It had been a long year and Joe was feeling down
hearted because he didn't reach some of his goals set forth for himself and his
business. It didn't help that Joe's family and all of those around him had been
full of the Christmas spirit; wrapping presents, singing holiday songs, getting
ready for the play at church and even going Christmas caroling. Yes, it was
true; Joe Vendor was trying to be Joe Scrooge. No one was particularly enjoying
his company. Even the neighbors avoided a chance for conversation when passing
him on the street.
It seemed that all Joe could remember were the times at work
when all of the crazy things had happened to him and you know the rest! People
can be cruel. There was always someone there to make a joke out of Joe's
situations.
One of the scariest times was when Joe arrived at work around 5:30
a.m. It was still very quiet and not all of the lights were turned on in the
building. Just when Joe entered his break room he tripped over a body that was
lying right in front of his bank of machines. Needless to say, while tripping
and catching his balance Joe kept right on running out of that break room
straight to the security desk. When returning to the break room the body was
gone. It was a good feeling for Joe to know that the body was alive, but it left
him to wonder where it went, or if someday it would be back. Not to mention that
security thought Joe was nuts when the body was gone.
There was also the time
when Joe arrived at work mid morning only to find out that there was a family of
Korean people in the lobby. Although they weren't supposed to be cooking in the
lobby, it was just like home. They had crock pots and were cooking shrimp and
beef tips on skewers. After smelling the wonderful aroma for what seemed to be
hours, Joe surrendered to temptation and agreed to join them for lunch, only to
look up and see his building contact. That was the end of lunch hour. The
building contact wasn't happy and Joe found himself explaining away his actions
again. After all Joe just figured if you can't beat 'em, join 'em. Too bad his
building contact didn't agree with his philosophy.
Now keep in mind that Joe
has been at his job for quite some time and knew the halls, walkways, rooms and
break areas very well. Joe was just like clockwork and he could count on using
the restroom every day around 9:30 a.m. This particular day was no different.
When Joe walked toward the restroom he noticed a woman standing outside the door
and assumed she was waiting for her husband or a friend. Sometimes life's
situations are more urgent than others and today Joe was in a bit of a hurry so
he just kept walking straight into the first available stall. You know the
rest!!! He was just sitting there minding his own business when he began to hear
a muffled tinkle coming from the stall beside him. Joe didn't worry! He knew he
was in the right place. After washing his hands, Joe was walking out of the
restroom only to hear a set of high heels walking right next to him and going
the same direction. Now how can this be? Leave it to the cleaning crew to work
on the women's restroom and temporarily divert the ladies straight to the men's
restroom. People were laughing, looking at him like he was totally nuts and some
were glaring at him. It took several weeks before Joe would live this one down.
When the phone rang, Joe wasn't in the mood for talking but welcomed a break
from feeling miserable. He was told that the cab bringing his Mother was in a
wreck and she was taken to the nearest hospital. Joe was desperate to get there
and would stop for no one. All the way there he was afraid to think of what the
outcome could be. The snow was falling hard, the wind was blowing sheets of snow
across the streets and the temperature was just perfect for a huge storm. None
of this would slow Joe down. A few minutes seemed like countless hours and
finally Joe arrived at the hospital to find his precious mother doing just fine
and waiting for him to pick her up.
All of those crazy, scary, funny and upsetting things that
happened over the year didn't seem to matter any more. Joe was so thankful; he
vowed to have the best Christmas ever. Joe realized that no matter how bad you
think you've got it, things could get much worse. Return to TOC
18 HAIL TO THE
CHAMPIONS! By: Ed Birmingham
The
baseball wars began way back in the spring with a very optimistic article
written by Kyle Daniels about his favorite team, the Flubs. That was followed up
by another well written article by Jan Wetmore about her favorite team the St.
Louis Cardinals, who at the time were in the process of running away with the
National League Central Division. The Cardinals, for most of the year, looked to
be the favorite to claim the World Series Title. Unfortunately for them, their
manager did what he does best and did less with more once again.
Then it was
time to save the best for last, the article about the Chicago White Sox. Please
don't misunderstand; I'm not referring to the shmuck that wrote the article, I'm
referring to the subject matter. The ironic thing was at the time that the
article about the White Sox was written, it almost didn't make it into the
Vendor's Voice. If you remember correctly the Sox were on the verge of blowing a
double-digit lead in the division to the surging Cleveland Indians. At that
time, Jan Schuler was protecting me from total embarrassment and held off
putting the article in until the last possible moment. She even contacted me to
see if I wanted to pull the article out. Not being very smart, I told her to
leave it in and I will take whatever abuse that comes my way.
Thank God the Sox
righted the ship and won 16 of their last 17 games in route to their first title
in 88 years. The Sox led their division from start to finish; they had the best
road record in all of baseball including going 6 and 0 in the playoffs on the
road. They won the first game of the season 1-0. They won the first game after
the All Star break 1-0, and then won their last game of the year, game 4 of the
World Series 1-0.
They were also the first team in World Series history to win
2 World Series games on the same day, game 3 went well past midnight and game 4
ended well before midnight. The point I'm trying to make is this was just one of
those magical years that comes along once every 88 or so years. The heroes are
too many to mention. Everyone on the roster contributed during the course of the
season at one time or another. I think it's time that we realize that the Sox
are no longer the second banana in the second city and that all of the pressure
is now on that minor league team to the north of the Cell.
Yes, Sox fans, thump
your chest, wear your World Series hats and shirts proudly because before you
know it, it will be October again and we can only hope that we will be there
defending our title. Go Sox!! The following article is a reprint from a
national magazine that we thought our readers would be interested in reading,
enjoy. Return to TOC
19 PROGRAMS FOR
DISABLED AND BLIND FACING INCREASED SCRUTINY
By Neil Munro,
National Journal
Two federal programs that provide jobs for
disabled and blind Americans are under scrutiny in the Senate and face possible
overhauls after operating for decades with minimal government oversight. The
Javits-Wagner-O'Day, or JWOD, program aimed at employing disabled workers and
the Randolph-Sheppard program for the blind are likely to be the subjects of
lobbying fights on Capitol Hill. The programs' beneficiaries, including many
disabled entrepreneurs and workers, are fighting among themselves for shares of
available funding, even as senators sketch out possible reforms.
Senator Michael
Enzi, Republican-Wyoming, the chairman of the Health, Education, Labor, and
Pensions (HELP) Committee, says that the two programs are "well-intentioned" but
"long overdue for oversight." At a committee hearing in October, ranking member
Senator Edward Kennedy, Democrat-Massachusetts, echoed Enzi's criticisms,
declaring that "there's no excuse for fraud and abuse. The time is right for
reform."
JWOD was created in 1938 and amended in 1971. Its governing board is
appointed by the president. JWOD serves as the government's broker for
approximately $2 billion worth of low-tech services and products, such as office
supplies, janitorial services, and furniture, purchased by federal departments
and agencies. The supplies and services are provided by JWOD-approved private
businesses that employ roughly 45,000 disabled workers nationwide.
These
businesses face minimal competition within the JWOD program. JWOD officials
decide which private enterprises get particular contracts, and also set the
prices that federal agencies must pay to these enterprises. Moreover, about 4
percent of the $2 billion in annual sales, or $80 million, is rebated to two
JWOD nonprofit management companies, the National Industries for the Blind in
Alexandria, Va., and NISH, formerly the National Industries for the Severely
Handicapped, in Vienna, Va. Commercial vendors and some groups representing the
disabled have loudly criticized JWOD, saying that the program excludes them and
their workers from government contracts. These critics also say that the program
segregates disabled workers from the commercial market, overcharges the federal
government, and generates excessive profits for the owners of the JWOD-sanctioned
enterprises, most of who are not disabled.
At the hearing, Enzi released a
report that said only 2,370 disabled workers had moved from the JWOD program
into the commercial marketplace in 2004, and it highlighted numerous examples of
"excessive executive compensation, lavish perquisites, conflicts of interest,
and self-dealing" within JWOD enterprises.
In July, JWOD officials dropped plans
for new oversight rules for JWOD enterprises. These rules would have set salary
caps for executives and established conflict-of-interest provisions for the
enterprises' governing boards. JWOD "is planning on issuing a new proposed rule
by the end of the year," a program spokesman said in an interview.
Enzi also
criticized the 1936 Randolph-Sheppard Act, which puts blind business owners
first in line to run kiosks and dining halls at federal buildings and camps. The
program awards some lucrative contracts to blind business owners without
ensuring employment for disabled workers, he said.
Enzi gave little indication
of what reform would involve, but said, "We can do better than this by getting
more workers into the employment mainstream." No reform bill will likely appear
this year, said Enzi spokesman Craig Orfield. "We're several steps away from
introducing a bill."
James Gashel, executive director for strategic initiatives
for the National Federation of the Blind, said that the 2,600 blind business
owners working under Randolph-Sheppard want to keep their program intact because
it works well. The two Randolph-Sheppard programs, NIB and NISH, also face
competition from JWOD contractors. Gashel spends much of his time fending off
efforts by JWOD enterprises to gain control of military dining hall contracts
now held by 39 blind business owners. "We tried for two, three years to be
accommodating with them in Congress by offering agreements that they never would
accept," he said.
NISH is the leading player in the JWOD sector, in part because
it serves as the back office for roughly 80 percent of the JWOD-affiliated
enterprises. With its share of the rebate, NISH identifies products for
inclusion in the JWOD program and searches for commercial opportunities for the
JWOD enterprises, including the contracts now held by the Randolph-Sheppard
businesses. Tony Young, NISH's wheelchair-bound senior public policy director,
testified to Enzi that military dining halls don't belong in the
Randolph-Sheppard program. He urged greater federal use of the JWOD program, and
declared that NISH is proud of the employment, wages, and dignity brought to the
program's disabled workers. Commercial vendors of office products and furniture,
allied under the Independent Office Products and Furniture Dealers Association,
want to shrink or change the JWOD program. The group complains that the program
has taken business and jobs away from its members.
Paul Miller, government
affairs director of the association, says that his group's companies can employ
a larger number of disabled people, but they need incentives from the government
to pay the cost of extra aid and technology for these workers. Private
companies, he said, also need liability protection to avoid the legal risks
involved in laying off disabled workers along with other workers.
October 21,
2005 Return to TOC
20 TO THE EDITOR OF
USA TODAY
On Thursday October 20, 2005, you ran an article
on 2 federal programs that are intended to create employment opportunities for
people with disabilities. The Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pension
Committee is looking into several programs for disabled people to determine the
impact they have on disabled hiring.
One of the programs in your article was the
Randolph- Sheppard Program, which gives priority to blind people to operate
businesses on federal property. I am a forty year old resident of Illinois who
is blind and have been a member of Illinois' Randolph-Sheppard Program for over
twelve years. The Randolph- Sheppard Program has afforded me the opportunity to
find substantial and gainful employment along with a sense of independence that
as a disabled person, I thought I would never be able to achieve. Shouldn't that
be the goal of any program that is intended to create a better life for a
disabled person, financial and personal independence?
The Randolph-Sheppard
Program should in fact be a model for other disabled hiring programs. Your
article stated that there are 2,681 blind vendors who employ 7,122 people, 615
of whom are disabled. That means that 8.63 percent of the blind vendors' work
force is disabled, this is higher than the private sector and in fact is higher
than the Federal Government's percentage of disabled workers. In an ideal world
as disabled people we would have a 100 percent disabled work force, but as a
blind person I realize that there are certain jobs that I can't do, the pilots
union still won't call me back.
In Illinois the average income of a blind
vendor is roughly $45,000, but we are considered self employed, so that $45,000
is taxed higher, we receive no sick days, vacation pay or any benefits at all.
The Senate Committee is chaired by Senator Mike Enzi (R-Wy). The Committee is
questioning whether Randolph-Sheppard Vendors hire enough disabled workers. I'd
be curious to see how many disabled staff members Senator Enzi and the rest of
the Senators on the Committee currently employee. If it's over 8 percent GREAT,
if not I hope before they throw stones at blind people they'd be willing to hire
them.
One of the Committee's potential recommendations is to combine the
Randolph-Sheppard Program with another Federal Program, the Javits-Wagner-O'Day
Program (JWOD). JWOD is intended to employ people with disabilities to produce
products that the Government will then purchase (mops, brooms etc.).
A recent
article in the October 18th edition of The Oregonian reported that some non
disabled CEO's of organizations under JWOD receive compensation in excess of
$700,000, while their disabled employees earn less than the minimum wage, as low
as $1.93 per hour. Unless having no scruples or integrity has recently been
deemed a disability, the wrong people are benefiting, this just isn't right.
As
a blind person even I can see the problem. What I can't see is why the Senate
Committee would want to combine a successful disability program, the
Randolph-Sheppard Program, with a program that has their priorities reversed, Javits-Wagner-O'Day. The intent was to help disabled people not their bosses,
remember?
Kevin Dwyer
3218 Cherry Hills Dr
Champaign,
Illinois 61822
217/493-7869
cc: Members of the United
States Senate Return to TOC
21 November 18, 2005
TO THE HONORABLE MEMBERS
OF THE UNITED STATES SENATE,
On October 20, 2005 the
Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pension Committee held hearings on two
federal programs that are designed to create job opportunities for people with
disabilities. These programs are the Randolph-Sheppard Program (RSA) and the
Javitz, Wagner, O'Day Program (JWOD).
On their most basic levels, the
Randolph-Sheppard Program is designed to create self employment opportunities
for blind people by giving them the priority to operate food service operations,
vending operations and retail operations on federal property. JWOD is designed
to employ disabled people to manufacture products that are sold to the federal
government, mops, brooms, clocks, etc. These two programs have coexisted
successfully for decades. They were created separately to achieve separate
goals, and that is what they have done.
I am a forty year old blind person, who
is a husband and a father of three. I have been a member of the
Randolph-Sheppard Program for over twelve years, and I would like to think that
I am a successful example of the Randolph-Sheppard Program's potential. Recently
my wife and I have learned that two of our children were born with my eye
disease. As you can imagine the future and success of the Randolph-Sheppard
Program has become an even more important issue to me.
Admittedly, these
programs may have some problems; the military has problems, social security has
problems, the economy has problems, I think we both know I could go on, but I
won't.
The HELP Committee is questioning whether enough disabled people are
being helped by these programs. One of the Committee's recommendations for a
possible solution is to combine these two programs. I have been trying to find
the logic in this recommendation, I can't can you? If two programs have
problems, will combining them correct the problems? Common sense would tell you
no.
Despite the HELP Committee's good intentions, as a blind person it is
unnerving to think that they can not have an accurate perspective on the most
effective way to strengthen the Randolph-Sheppard Program. With all due respect
the Committee members don't know what it is like to be blind, so how can they
know how best to help a blind person?
Senator Jennings Randolph, co-author of
the Randolph- Sheppard Act developed a detached retina, seriously affecting his
vision. At that time the treatment for a detached retina was to remain on your
back for six months to allow the retina to heal. This gave Senator Randolph a
true understanding of what it is like to be blind, and gave him insight in the
most effective way to help blind people.
Blind Americans currently have an
unemployment rate of over 70 percent. In addition, doctors are now finding that
solar related eye disorders that once only affected people in their 70's and
80's, are now being found in people as young as 40. An age when people still
have families to support and still can be a viable part of America's work force.
The Randolph-Sheppard Program should not be downsized, changed, or combined
with any other program; rather it should be strengthened and expanded to prepare
for the coming onslaught of newly blinded Americans.
With this in mind may I then suggest to you:
1. Don't let the HELP
Committee combine these two programs, which will inevitably create a
bureaucratic nightmare for disabled people.
2. Urge the HELP
Committee to convene a panel that would include blind vendors, to address any
issues in the Randolph-Sheppard Program.
3. Be proactive;
strengthen the Randolph-Sheppard Program to prepare for the inevitable increase
of people who will benefit from what this program has to offer.
Who better to help
correct any problems in a program for blind vendors, than blind vendors? If you
were trying to correct problems within a program for women, would you exclude
input from women?
If you were trying to correct problems within a program for
minorities, would you exclude input from minorities? I would hope not. So why
then is it acceptable to exclude input from blind vendors?
Please help to ensure
the future of the Randolph-Sheppard Program, not only for me and my children,
but for all blind people, today and in the future.
Despite the fact that I am
not a resident of your state, I would still respectfully request a response
stating your thoughts and position on this issue. I may not be from your state
but I can assure you that there are blind people residing in your state and your
opinion will significantly impact them. Thank you,
Kevin Dwyer
3218 Cherry Hills Drive
Champaign,
Illinois 61822
217/493-7869
Fax 217/352-3284
k.dwyer@insightbb.com Return to TOC
22 October 18, 2005
TO THE HONORABLE SENATOR
MIKE ENZI
379 Russell Senate Office
Building
Washington,
D.C. 20510
Dear Senator Enzi,
My name is Kevin Dwyer
and I am a forty year old resident of Illinois who is legally blind. I was born
with a rare form of macular degeneration called Stargardts disease. Stargardts
disease causes a gradual loss of the central vision. I was born with 20/20
vision, but by the time I hit my teens I was considered legally blind.
I am
currently a member of the Business Enterprise Program for the Blind (BEPB) under
the Randolph-Sheppard Program. As I'm sure you know the BEPB is a federally
mandated program that is intended to create employment opportunities for people
who are blind or visually impaired. The BEPB was created after the passage of
the 1936 Randolph-Sheppard Act. The Randolph-Sheppard Act provides that a blind
or visually impaired person has the priority to operate businesses on federal
property.
Blind Americans currently experience an unemployment rate of over 70
percent; it is not due to a lack of desire to work, but rather a lack of
opportunities. Prior to becoming a vendor in the Randolph-Sheppard Program, I
experienced the difficulties of trying to find an employer that would give me a
chance. I didn't think I was going to have much of a future, until I found the
Randolph-Sheppard Program.
When I became a member of the Randolph-Sheppard
Program, I was afforded the opportunity to find substantial and gainful
employment. More importantly I was able to find a sense of independence that I
thought I would never be able to reach. Shouldn't that be the goal of any
program that is intended to help the disabled?
I currently live in Champaign,
Illinois with my wife and three children. As a parent I'm sure that you can
agree that we hope our children will have better opportunities than we had.
Better opportunities for education and for a career.
In April of this year my 6
year old son, Kevin Jr. was diagnosed with Stargardts disease. My wife and I are
still coming to terms with his diagnosis. Having Stargardts myself I know I am
going to be a staunch advocate for him, but I also know first hand what to
expect.
I still remember the day I realized I couldn't play little league
anymore, I know that day is coming for Kevin. I still remember the days when
doors were slammed in my face because I was blind; I also know those days are
coming for him.
What I don't know is whether or not the Randolph-Sheppard
Program will still be there for him, and that scares me.
On Thursday October 20,
2005, the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, held a hearing
on "Federal Programs for People with Disabilities".
I am asking for your help.
On behalf of me, blind individuals across the country and my son Kevin, can you
please understand that the Randolph-Sheppard Program is a program that truly
does benefit people who are disabled, and in fact should be a model for other
programs.
Can you think of a reason not to support a program for people who are
blind, that does what it was intended to do? I hope not. Sincerely,
Kevin Dwyer
3218 Cherry Hills Drive
Champaign,
Illinois 61822
217/493-7869
k.dwyer@insightbb.com Return to TOC
23 RECORDS OF
RETENTION SCHEDULE
By: Jim Katz
NOTE: The chart below is
arranged as follows:
Type of Record: Period to
be Retained.
Accident reports and
claims (settled cases): 7 Years.
Accounts payable ledgers
and schedules: 7 Years.
Accounts receivable
ledgers and schedules: 7 Years.
Audit reports of
accountants: Permanently.
Bank reconciliations: 1
Year.
Bank statements: 3 Years.
Canceled checks for
important payments (taxes, purchases of property, special contracts, etc.):
Permanently.
Canceled checks for other
payments: 7 Years.
Capital stock and bond
records; ledgers transfer registers, stubs showing issues, record of interest
coupons, options, etc.:Permanently.
Cash book: Permanently.
Chart of accounts:
Permanently.
Contracts and leases
(still in effect): Permanently.
Contracts and leases
(expired): 7 Years.
Copyright registrations:
Permanently.
Corporation's records,
Incorporation records, minute books of directors and stockholders, including
by-laws and charter: Permanently.
Correspondence (routine)
with customers or vendors: 1 Year.
Correspondence (general):
3 Year.
Correspondence (legal and
important matters only): Permanently.
Credit history:
Permanently.
Deeds, mortgages and
bills of sale: Permanently.
Depreciation schedules:
Permanently.
Duplicate deposit slips:
1 Year.
Employee personnel
records (after termination): 3 Years.
Employment applications:
3 Years.
Expense analyses and
expense distribution schedules: 7 Years.
Expense reports: 7 Years.
Financial statements (end
of year, other months optional): Permanently.
General and private
ledgers (and end of year trial balances): Permanently.
Insurance policies
(expired), Insurance records, current accident reports, claims, policies, etc.:
Permanently.
Internal audit (in some
situations, longer retention periods may be desirable): 3 Years.
Internal reports
(miscellaneous): 3 Years.
Inventories of products,
materials and supplies: 7 Years.
Invoices to customers: 7
Years.
Invoices from vendors: 7
Years.
Journals: Permanently.
Notes receivable ledgers
and schedules: 7 Years.
Option records (expired):
7 Years.
Paid bills: 7 Years.
Patent registrations:
Permanently.
Payroll records and
summaries, including payments to pensions: 7 Years.
Petty cash vouchers: 3
Years.
Physical inventory tags:
3 Years.
Plant cost ledgers: 7
Years.
Property appraisals by
outside appraisers: Permanently.
Property records
including costs, end of year trial balances, depreciation schedules, blueprints
and plans: Permanently.
Purchase orders (except
purchasing department copy): 1 Year.
Purchase orders
(purchasing department copy): 7 Years.
Receiving sheets: 1 Year.
Requisitions: 1 Year.
Royalty computations: 7
Years.
Sales records: 1 Year.
Salesman commission
reports: 7 Years.
Savings bond registration
records of employees: 3 Years.
Scrap and salvage records
(inventories, sales, etc.): 7 Years.
Stenographer's notebooks:
1 Year.
Stock and bond
certificates (cancelled): 7 Years.
Stockroom withdrawal
forms: 1 Year.
Subsidiary ledgers: 7
Years.
Tax returns and
worksheets, revenue agents' reports and other documents relating to
determination of income tax liability: Permanently.
Time books: 7 Years.
Trade mark registrations:
Permanently.
Vouchers register and
schedules: 7 Years.
Vouchers for payment to vendors, employees, etc. (includes allowances and
reimbursement of employees, officers, etc. for travel and entertainment
expenses): 7 Years.
The above records
retention schedule is a recommended guideline. The type of business, specific
needs of management and governmental regulatory requirements are additional
factors used in determining the proper retention period. Legal advice may be
advisable.
Return to TOC
|